Return to Question History Index



Master and Commander:
The Far Side of the World

Miramax (2003), directed by Peter Weir
Russell Crowe, Paul Bettany, Billy Boyd

Review by Karen Ackermann

The plot is simple: Get the Acheron.

One wonders how it can take three hours to do so but the time is filled so well that it does not feel like three hours have passed in the movie theater. With a simple plot and minimal dialog, the focus of this film is on the details of the men and their lives on board a British naval fighting ship in 1804. Even so, these details are made a smooth part of the story line and are not belabored.

Patrick O'Brian, author of the Jack Aubrey-Stephen Maturin series upon which this movie is based, did his historical research well. His novels are based on original sources such as log-books, official letters, and contemporary accounts or memoirs. Although he admits to taking great liberties with names, dates, and minor events--changing them to suit his needs--he nevertheless wrote within the context of general historical accuracy. This makes for a great read and a thrilling movie.

O'Brian brought the details of a sea-bound life in the early nineteenth century to the page and this movie reproduces the same on screen.

By 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte is well on his way to conquering Europe. He has sold French territory to the young United States, the Louisiana Purchase which Lewis and Clark are busily exploring, to help finance his war. Now, he wants mastery of the seas as well as the continent. The British government has sent Jack Aubrey, Master and Commander of the Surprise, to take the French Acheron as a prize. With him is his long-time friend, ship's surgeon, and intelligence agent, Stephen Maturin.

The details are everywhere. Clothing for officers and sailors. Ages ranging from the very young boys (some of whom command men decades older than themselves) to the oldest men with gray hair who still serve as able-bodied seamen. Cannons with names carved on their wooden carriages. Sleeping conditions. Differences between the captain's quarters and those of everyone else's. Differences in the food and drink served officers and that served the men. Manning the pumps, dropping the lead, operating the lines and sails to make the best of the wind. Shipboard discipline: flogging a disrespectful sailor, dealing with becalmed seas and the boredom that ensues. Sailors' superstitions. Surgery. Death and burial at sea. The time it takes for one ship to catch another and the advantages of having a wind favorable to oneself and not the enemy. Ingenuity to secure successful capture of the enemy and survival when rounding Cape Horn in an icy storm.

Violence, too, is everywhere but the scenes are fast, almost too fast to even take in the action--one wonders how anyone could have fought well in such chaos--and there is little gore displayed on screen. We don't need to see it to imagine it. And imagination can be a powerful tool, not only for the audience but for the men in 1804 who believed so strongly in their superstitions that one young officer would kill himself rather than continue to jinx the Surprise. So while we watch the fighting, we don't need to see the graphic depiction of the slaughter resulting from battles at sea. We can imagine how bad it really was to be on board ships of the line that broad-sided each with barrage after barrage of cannon fire and then added rifles, pistols, and swords to the fighting complement as boarding parties landed. Battles at sea in 1804 were close-in fights with deadly weapons that tore bodies and ships to pieces.

Despite the main title of the movie, this is not a faithful rendition of Patrick O'Brian's first book, Master and Commander. To name just two differences: in the book, Jack and Stephen meet for the first time and their initial meeting is somewhat strained while the movie has had them sailing together for years; and, in the book, Jack commands the Sophie, not the Surprise, a ship featured in a future volume. Scenes are taken from several of O'Brian's books in the Aubrey-Maturin series, but are well-blended for a seamless film. At first consideration, it would seem that this would be a stand-alone movie because of this combining that has already occurred but future ones may be in the offing nevertheless. The movie ends with a clear potential for a sequel.

Despite the deceptively simple plot, this is a film that draws in the viewer for an unflinching look at life in the Royal Navy in 1804.

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World has been released on DVD and VHS, and is available through our affiliate -- Amazon.Com.

Master and Commander
   

Post Captain


The Far Side of the World
       
Naval fiction has had two great writers in the past 80 years: first, C. S. Forester with his Horatio Hornblower series and second, Patrick O'Brian with his Jack Aubrey-Stephen Maturin series. Both authors have also had their books turned into movies; the former most recently for television and the latter for the big screen. O'Brian had greater access to museum and archive records than did his predecessor but small lapses in accuracy by either author are easily forgiven in exchange for well-developed characters and rousing adventure.

In his lavishly illustrated book, Jack Aubrey Commands: An Historical Companion to the Naval World of Patrick O'Brian (2003), author Brian Lavery introduces us to the factual history of the Royal Navy of the 18th and early 19th centuries. He describes the world of the seaman, including British industry, politics, and society, as well as naval infrastructure, naval bases, and the merchant navy. He discusses ship design and building, rigging, armament, the various kinds of ships (including experimental craft), and prizes. The many ranks of officers are covered, along with how to gain entry into naval service, the oral examination for lieutenant, living conditions, and promotions. The men of the lower deck include seamen, artisans, and marines; their lives on board ship and the work of press gangs are described. Lavery rounds out his book with a look at life at sea and covers the many facets of ship board activities (rope work, sail handling, navigation, watches, entertainment, discipline, and the like), naval actions when at war, and identification of Britain's enemies and allies. An excellent introduction to the facts behind the fiction.
Branching out beyond the Napoleonic era covered by Patrick O'Brian in his Jack Aubrey-Stephen Maturin series, Naval Warfare in the Age of Sail: War at Sea, 1756-1815 (2000) by Bernard Ireland begins with the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) and ends with a review of the post-War of 1812 Royal Navy.

During the reign of King George III (1760-1820), Britain was almost continuously at war, especially against the Americans and the French. Manned by under-educated, malnourished, and impoverished seamen, many impressed into service against their will, the British Navy nevertheless dominated the high seas during this time and gained prominence as the most feared fighting force on earth. Britain ruled the world's oceans.

Learn how this happened in this gorgeously illustrated history book on the Royal Navy. (Illustrations range from the contemporary to current works by acclaimed naval artist Tony Gibbons.) The author discusses how warships were constructed, sailed, and fought, including specific single-ship actions and fleet operations, as well as the day-to-day routines of the men. This was a world in which men, not technology, counted. Much of the construction work was done by hand: trees were felled, cut, and shaped by saws; rigging was manufactured using simple equipment; sails were fabricated using non-electric looms.

Sails, not diesel engines, powered the ships and men scrambled up rigging high above the decks to furl and unfurl the sheets in all weathers. Radar and a weapon-activating button did not distance combatants from one another; fired weapons shot one bullet or cannonball at a time, requiring skill to reload properly as the enemy closed in, while sharp-edged weapons required nerve to use in close quarters. Officers, often almost casually recruited themselves, motivated their rag-tag body of men by steady example and whipped (sometimes literally) them into a disciplined, unified crew that saw respect from around the world in Britain's naval heyday.




Return to the index
Questions and comments to Question History

Original materials copyright © 2003 Question History, LLC,
all rights reserved.